Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions.

Ohlmeier, C; Linder, R; Enders, D; Mikolajczyk, Rafael; Haverkamp, W; Horenkamp-Sonntag, D; Garbe, E

Name:

Ohlmeier et al_final.pdf

Size:

238.8Kb

Format:

PDF

Description:

original manuscript

Download

Name:

Figure_1.tif

Size:

35.76Mb

Format:

TIFF image

Description:

figure 1

Download

Name:

Figure_2.tiff

Size:

1.030Mb

Format:

TIFF image

Description:

figure 2

Download

Name:

Supplementary_tables 1-3.pdf

Size:

45.88Kb

Format:

PDF

Description:

supplementary tables 1 to 3

Download

Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.

Star rating

Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback

Authors

Ohlmeier, C
Linder, R
Enders, D
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Haverkamp, W
Horenkamp-Sonntag, D
Garbe, E

Issue Date

2014

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

To compare the quality of care regarding the use of elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the inpatient and outpatient setting and to evaluate different methods of confounder control in this context.

Citation

Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions. 2014, 53 (4):269-77 Methods Inf Med

Affiliation

Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Type

Article

Language

ISSN

0026-1270

Collections

Publications of the AG (ESME)

The following license files are associated with this item: