dc.contributor.author	Ohlmeier, C
dc.contributor.author	Linder, R
dc.contributor.author	Enders, D
dc.contributor.author	Mikolajczyk, Rafael
dc.contributor.author	Haverkamp, W
dc.contributor.author	Horenkamp-Sonntag, D
dc.contributor.author	Garbe, E
dc.date.accessioned	2015-01-23T13:56:55Z	en
dc.date.available	2015-01-23T13:56:55Z	en
dc.date.issued	2014	en
dc.identifier.citation	Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions. 2014, 53 (4):269-77 Methods Inf Med	en
dc.identifier.issn	0026-1270	en
dc.identifier.pmid	25077437	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.3414/ME13-01-0132	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10033/338725	en
dc.description.abstract	To compare the quality of care regarding the use of elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the inpatient and outpatient setting and to evaluate different methods of confounder control in this context.
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.title	Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions.	en
dc.type	Article	en
dc.contributor.department	Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.	en
dc.identifier.journal	Methods of information in medicine	en
refterms.dateFOA	2015-12-15T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstract	To compare the quality of care regarding the use of elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the inpatient and outpatient setting and to evaluate different methods of confounder control in this context.

Evaluating methods for intersectoral comparison of quality of care. A routine data analysis of elective percutaneous coronary interventions.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Related articles