Marine biofilm bacteria evade eukaryotic predation by targeted chemical defense.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Matz, CarstenWebb, Jeremy S
Schupp, Peter J
Phang, Shui Yen
Penesyan, Anahit
Egan, Suhelen
Steinberg, Peter
Kjelleberg, Staffan
Issue Date
2008
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Many plants and animals are defended from predation or herbivory by inhibitory secondary metabolites, which in the marine environment are very common among sessile organisms. Among bacteria, where there is the greatest metabolic potential, little is known about chemical defenses against bacterivorous consumers. An emerging hypothesis is that sessile bacterial communities organized as biofilms serve as bacterial refuge from predation. By testing growth and survival of two common bacterivorous nanoflagellates, we find evidence that chemically mediated resistance against protozoan predators is common among biofilm populations in a diverse set of marine bacteria. Using bioassay-guided chemical and genetic analysis, we identified one of the most effective antiprotozoal compounds as violacein, an alkaloid that we demonstrate is produced predominately within biofilm cells. Nanomolar concentrations of violacein inhibit protozoan feeding by inducing a conserved eukaryotic cell death program. Such biofilm-specific chemical defenses could contribute to the successful persistence of biofilm bacteria in various environments and provide the ecological and evolutionary context for a number of eukaryote-targeting bacterial metabolites.Citation
Marine biofilm bacteria evade eukaryotic predation by targeted chemical defense. 2008, 3 (7):e2744 PLoS ONEAffiliation
School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences and Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Journal
PLoS ONEPubMed ID
18648491Additional Links
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002744Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1932-6203ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0002744
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
Related articles
- Impact of violacein-producing bacteria on survival and feeding of bacterivorous nanoflagellates.
- Authors: Matz C, Deines P, Boenigk J, Arndt H, Eberl L, Kjelleberg S, Jürgens K
- Issue date: 2004 Mar
- Overview of the chemical ecology of benthic marine invertebrates along the western Antarctic peninsula.
- Authors: McClintock JB, Amsler CD, Baker BJ
- Issue date: 2010 Dec
- The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections.
- Authors: Bjarnsholt T
- Issue date: 2013 May
- Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal.
- Authors: McDougald D, Rice SA, Barraud N, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S
- Issue date: 2011 Nov 28
- Antimicrobial activity of surface attached marine bacteria in biofilms.
- Authors: Wilson GS, Raftos DA, Nair SV
- Issue date: 2011 Sep 20