Proposing an empirically justified reference threshold for blood culture sampling rates in intensive care units.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Karch, AndréCastell, Stefanie
Schwab, Frank
Geffers, Christine
Bongartz, Hannah
Brunkhorst, Frank M
Gastmeier, Petra
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Issue Date
2015-02
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Early and appropriate blood culture sampling is recommended as a standard of care for patients with suspected bloodstream infections (BSI) but is rarely taken into account when quality indicators for BSI are evaluated. To date, sampling of about 100 to 200 blood culture sets per 1,000 patient-days is recommended as the target range for blood culture rates. However, the empirical basis of this recommendation is not clear. The aim of the current study was to analyze the association between blood culture rates and observed BSI rates and to derive a reference threshold for blood culture rates in intensive care units (ICUs). This study is based on data from 223 ICUs taking part in the German hospital infection surveillance system. We applied locally weighted regression and segmented Poisson regression to assess the association between blood culture rates and BSI rates. Below 80 to 90 blood culture sets per 1,000 patient-days, observed BSI rates increased with increasing blood culture rates, while there was no further increase above this threshold. Segmented Poisson regression located the threshold at 87 (95% confidence interval, 54 to 120) blood culture sets per 1,000 patient-days. Only one-third of the investigated ICUs displayed blood culture rates above this threshold. We provided empirical justification for a blood culture target threshold in ICUs. In the majority of the studied ICUs, blood culture sampling rates were below this threshold. This suggests that a substantial fraction of BSI cases might remain undetected; reporting observed BSI rates as a quality indicator without sufficiently high blood culture rates might be misleading.Citation
Proposing an empirically justified reference threshold for blood culture sampling rates in intensive care units. 2015, 53 (2):648-52 J. Clin. Microbiol.Affiliation
Helmholtz Centre for infection research, Inhoffenstr. 7, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.Journal
Journal of clinical microbiologyPubMed ID
25520442Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1098-660Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1128/JCM.02944-14
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item: