Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHendel, N
dc.contributor.authorAkmatov, M K
dc.contributor.authorHamel, J
dc.contributor.authorVogelberg, C
dc.contributor.authorPessler, F
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T11:19:08Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T11:19:08Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationExhaled breath analysis in childhood rheumatic disorders--a longitudinal study. 2016, 10 (2):021001 J Breath Resen
dc.identifier.issn1752-7163
dc.identifier.pmid27093271
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1752-7155/10/2/021001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/619043
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to evaluate the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO50) and deaerated exhaled breath condensate pH (dEBCpH) as non-invasive markers of subclinical airway inflammation in pediatric patients with rheumatologic disorders. We determined FENO50 and dEBCpH in a prospective study spanning at least 12 months, comprising 85 pediatric patients with rheumatologic disorders, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA, n  =  63), chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO, n  =  6), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n  =  3), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM, n  =  1) and other rheumatic disorders (n  =  12). dEBCpH was determined once in a group of children without evidence of rheumatologic or pulmonary disease (controls, n  =  90). Findings were correlated with results of pulmonary function tests. Atopic sensitization was assessed by RAST or skin prick test in 76 patients. Atopic sensitization was detected in 34% (26/76) of patients. Neither FENO50 nor dEBCpH correlated with disease activity, but intermediately (20-35 ppb) or highly elevated (>35 ppb) levels were observed at least once in 26 patients (31%), 19 of whom had atopic sensitization. Median dEBCpH did not differ between cases and controls (8.05 versus 8.02; p  =  0.48). Median dEBCpH decreased slightly over the study period (p  =  0.02), whereas FENO50 values did not change significantly (p  =  0.89). There were several patients with significantly abnormal dEBCpH values that could not be readily explained by diagnosis, higher disease activity, medications, or atopic sensitization. Thus, there were no consistent abnormalities in FENO50 or dEBCpH in this cohort of Caucasian patients with relatively stable rheumatologic disorders, but there were some patients with abnormal values of unknown significance.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.titleExhaled breath analysis in childhood rheumatic disorders--a longitudinal study.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentTWINCORE Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research Feodor-Lynen-Str. 7 30625 Hannover, Germany.en
dc.identifier.journalJournal of breath researchen
refterms.dateFOA2017-09-10T00:00:00Z
html.description.abstractWe aimed to evaluate the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO50) and deaerated exhaled breath condensate pH (dEBCpH) as non-invasive markers of subclinical airway inflammation in pediatric patients with rheumatologic disorders. We determined FENO50 and dEBCpH in a prospective study spanning at least 12 months, comprising 85 pediatric patients with rheumatologic disorders, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA, n  =  63), chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO, n  =  6), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n  =  3), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM, n  =  1) and other rheumatic disorders (n  =  12). dEBCpH was determined once in a group of children without evidence of rheumatologic or pulmonary disease (controls, n  =  90). Findings were correlated with results of pulmonary function tests. Atopic sensitization was assessed by RAST or skin prick test in 76 patients. Atopic sensitization was detected in 34% (26/76) of patients. Neither FENO50 nor dEBCpH correlated with disease activity, but intermediately (20-35 ppb) or highly elevated (>35 ppb) levels were observed at least once in 26 patients (31%), 19 of whom had atopic sensitization. Median dEBCpH did not differ between cases and controls (8.05 versus 8.02; p  =  0.48). Median dEBCpH decreased slightly over the study period (p  =  0.02), whereas FENO50 values did not change significantly (p  =  0.89). There were several patients with significantly abnormal dEBCpH values that could not be readily explained by diagnosis, higher disease activity, medications, or atopic sensitization. Thus, there were no consistent abnormalities in FENO50 or dEBCpH in this cohort of Caucasian patients with relatively stable rheumatologic disorders, but there were some patients with abnormal values of unknown significance.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hendel et al.pdf
Size:
520.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
original manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/