Why one-size-fits-all vaso-modulatory interventions fail to control glioma invasion: in silico insights.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractGliomas are highly invasive brain tumours characterised by poor prognosis and limited response to therapy. There is an ongoing debate on the therapeutic potential of vaso-modulatory interventions against glioma invasion. Prominent vasculature-targeting therapies involve tumour blood vessel deterioration and normalisation. The former aims at tumour infarction and nutrient deprivation induced by blood vessel occlusion/collapse. In contrast, the therapeutic intention of normalising the abnormal tumour vasculature is to improve the efficacy of conventional treatment modalities. Although these strategies have shown therapeutic potential, it remains unclear why they both often fail to control glioma growth. To shed some light on this issue, we propose a mathematical model based on the migration/proliferation dichotomy of glioma cells in order to investigate why vaso-modulatory interventions have shown limited success in terms of tumour clearance. We found the existence of a critical cell proliferation/diffusion ratio that separates glioma responses to vaso-modulatory interventions into two distinct regimes. While for tumours, belonging to one regime, vascular modulations reduce the front speed and increase the infiltration width, for those in the other regime, the invasion speed increases and infiltration width decreases. We discuss how these in silico findings can be used to guide individualised vaso-modulatory approaches to improve treatment success rates.
CitationWhy one-size-fits-all vaso-modulatory interventions fail to control glioma invasion: in silico insights. 2016, 6:37283 Sci Rep
AffiliationBraunschweiger zentrum für Systembiologie, Rebenring 56,38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.
- Authors: Alfonso JCL, Talkenberger K, Seifert M, Klink B, Hawkins-Daarud A, Swanson KR, Hatzikirou H, Deutsch A
- Issue date: 2017 Nov
- Hybrid mathematical model of glioma progression.
- Authors: Tanaka ML, Debinski W, Puri IK
- Issue date: 2009 Oct
- Novel anti-angiogenic therapies for malignant gliomas.
- Authors: Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY
- Issue date: 2008 Dec
- LIM domain only 2 induces glioma invasion via cytosolic p27(KIP1).
- Authors: Park CG, Sohn YW, Kim EJ, Kim SH, Kim SC, Kim H
- Issue date: 2016 Feb
- Density-dependent quiescence in glioma invasion: instability in a simple reaction-diffusion model for the migration/proliferation dichotomy.
- Authors: Pham K, Chauviere A, Hatzikirou H, Li X, Byrne HM, Cristini V, Lowengrub J
- Issue date: 2012