• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Department of the research group infection genetics (INFG)
    • publications of the research group infection genetics (INFG)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Department of the research group infection genetics (INFG)
    • publications of the research group infection genetics (INFG)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of HZICommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsJournalTypesSubject (MeSH)This CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsJournalTypesSubject (MeSH)

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Local Links

    About: PolicyHelmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung HomepageHZI-Library HomepageContact usOpen AccessPublishing ApproachGetting StartedEditing ProfileBrowsing OptionsUsing SearchSubmitting ContentLicenced Journals & access details here

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Data-driven assessment of eQTL mapping methods

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    12864_2010_Article_3096.pdf
    Size:
    1.294Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Authors
    Michaelson, Jacob J
    Alberts, Rudi
    Schughart, Klaus
    Beyer, Andreas
    Issue Date
    2010-09-17
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract Background The analysis of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) is a potentially powerful way to detect transcriptional regulatory relationships at the genomic scale. However, eQTL data sets often go underexploited because legacy QTL methods are used to map the relationship between the expression trait and genotype. Often these methods are inappropriate for complex traits such as gene expression, particularly in the case of epistasis. Results Here we compare legacy QTL mapping methods with several modern multi-locus methods and evaluate their ability to produce eQTL that agree with independent external data in a systematic way. We found that the modern multi-locus methods (Random Forests, sparse partial least squares, lasso, and elastic net) clearly outperformed the legacy QTL methods (Haley-Knott regression and composite interval mapping) in terms of biological relevance of the mapped eQTL. In particular, we found that our new approach, based on Random Forests, showed superior performance among the multi-locus methods. Conclusions Benchmarks based on the recapitulation of experimental findings provide valuable insight when selecting the appropriate eQTL mapping method. Our battery of tests suggests that Random Forests map eQTL that are more likely to be validated by independent data, when compared to competing multi-locus and legacy eQTL mapping methods.
    Citation
    BMC Genomics. 2010 Sep 17;11(1):502
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-502
    http://hdl.handle.net/10033/620717
    Type
    Journal Article
    Collections
    publications of the research group infection genetics (INFG)

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Kontakt | Feedback abschicken
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.