Determination of nasal and oropharyngeal microbiomes in a multicenter population-based study - findings from Pretest 1 of the German National Cohort.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Akmatov, Manas KKoch, Nadine
Vital, Marius
Ahrens, Wolfgang
Flesch-Janys, Dieter
Fricke, Julia
Gatzemeier, Anja
Greiser, Halina
Günther, Kathrin
Illig, Thomas
Kaaks, Rudolf
Krone, Bastian
Kühn, Andrea
Linseisen, Jakob
Meisinger, Christine
Michels, Karin
Moebus, Susanne
Nieters, Alexandra
Obi, Nadia
Schultze, Anja
Six-Merker, Julia
Pieper, Dietmar H
Pessler, Frank
Issue Date
2017-05-12
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We examined acceptability, preference and feasibility of collecting nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, followed by microbiome analysis, in a population-based study with 524 participants. Anterior nasal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected by certified personnel. In addition, participants self-collected nasal swabs at home four weeks later. Four swab types were compared regarding (1) participants' satisfaction and acceptance and (2) detection of microbial community structures based on deep sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene V1-V2 variable regions. All swabbing methods were highly accepted. Microbial community structure analysis revealed 846 phylotypes, 46 of which were unique to oropharynx and 164 unique to nares. The calcium alginate tipped swab was found unsuitable for microbiome determinations. Among the remaining three swab types, there were no differences in oropharyngeal microbiomes detected and only marginal differences in nasal microbiomes. Microbial community structures did not differ between staff-collected and self-collected nasal swabs. These results suggest (1) that nasal and oropharyngeal swabbing are highly feasible methods for human population-based studies that include the characterization of microbial community structures in these important ecological niches, and (2) that self-collection of nasal swabs at home can be used to reduce cost and resources needed, particularly when serial measurements are to be taken.Citation
Determination of nasal and oropharyngeal microbiomes in a multicenter population-based study - findings from Pretest 1 of the German National Cohort. 2017, 7 (1):1855 Sci RepAffiliation
TWINCORE; Zentrum für experimentelle und klinische Infectionsforsching GmbH, Feodor-Lynen Str. 17, 30625 Hannover, Germany.Journal
Scientific reportsPubMed ID
28500287Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
2045-2322ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41598-017-01212-6
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Related articles
- The loss of topography in the microbial communities of the upper respiratory tract in the elderly.
- Authors: Whelan FJ, Verschoor CP, Stearns JC, Rossi L, Luinstra K, Loeb M, Smieja M, Johnstone J, Surette MG, Bowdish DM
- Issue date: 2014 May
- Serial home-based self-collection of anterior nasal swabs to detect Staphylococcus aureus carriage in a randomized population-based study in Germany.
- Authors: Akmatov MK, Mehraj J, Gatzemeier A, Strömpl J, Witte W, Krause G, Pessler F
- Issue date: 2014 Aug
- The nasal and oropharyngeal microbiomes of healthy livestock workers.
- Authors: Kates AE, Dalman M, Torner JC, Smith TC
- Issue date: 2019
- Composition and variation of respiratory microbiota in healthy military personnel.
- Authors: Hang J, Zavaljevski N, Yang Y, Desai V, Ruck RC, Macareo LR, Jarman RG, Reifman J, Kuschner RA, Keiser PB
- Issue date: 2017
- Influence of chronic azithromycin treatment on the composition of the oropharyngeal microbial community in patients with severe asthma.
- Authors: Lopes Dos Santos Santiago G, Brusselle G, Dauwe K, Deschaght P, Verhofstede C, Vaneechoutte D, Deschepper E, Jordens P, Joos G, Vaneechoutte M
- Issue date: 2017 May 10