[Physical activity in the German National Cohort (NAKO): use of multiple assessment tools and initial results].
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Baumeister, Sebastian E
Michels, Karin B
Schulze, Matthias B
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBACKGROUND: Physical activity is a complex behavior that is difficult to measure validly and reliably in large, population-based studies. Data on physical activity are available for the initial 100,000 participants of the German National Cohort. OBJECTIVES: To describe the baseline physical activity assessment in the cohort and to present initial descriptive results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Physical activity was assessed using a combination of tools, including two self-administered questionnaires, the Questionnaire on Annual Physical Activity Pattern (QUAP) and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ); a computer-based 24‑h physical activity recall (cpar24); and 7‑day accelerometry (Actigraph GT3X/+; ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA). RESULTS: The availability of data varied between assessment instruments (QUAP: n = 16,372; GPAQ: n = 90,900; cpar24: n = 23,989; accelerometry: n = 35,218). Analyses across measurement tools showed that on average, women spent 75 to 216 min/d, and men spent 73 to 224 min/d in moderate or higher intensity total physical activity. Persons aged 20-39 years spent 66 to 200 min/d, and persons aged 40-69 years spent 78 to 244 min/d in moderate or higher intensity total physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Initial baseline analyses of physical activity in this cohort show the value of using a combination of questionnaires, 24‑h recalls, and a movement sensor. The comprehensive data collection represents a valuable resource for future analyses and will improve our understanding of the association between physical activity and disease prevention.
CitationBundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Feb 13. pii: 10.1007/s00103-020-03099-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03099-7.
AffiliationHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
PublisherSpringer Open choice
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
- Design and Evaluation of a Computer-Based 24-Hour Physical Activity Recall (cpar24) Instrument.
- Authors: Kohler S, Behrens G, Olden M, Baumeister SE, Horsch A, Fischer B, Leitzmann MF
- Issue date: 2017 May 30
- Show cards of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) - do they impact validity? A crossover study.
- Authors: Rudolf K, Lammer F, Stassen G, Froböse I, Schaller A
- Issue date: 2020 Feb 12
- Reliability and Validity of the Self- and Interviewer-Administered Versions of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ).
- Authors: Chu AH, Ng SH, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F
- Issue date: 2015
- Calibration of the global physical activity questionnaire to Accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary behavior.
- Authors: Metcalf KM, Baquero BI, Coronado Garcia ML, Francis SL, Janz KF, Laroche HH, Sewell DK
- Issue date: 2018 Mar 27
- Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population.
- Authors: Chu AHY, Ng SHX, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F
- Issue date: 2018 Apr 12