Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Authors
Amann, Rudolf IBaichoo, Shakuntala
Blencowe, Benjamin J
Bork, Peer
Borodovsky, Mark
Brooksbank, Cath
Chain, Patrick S G
Colwell, Rita R
Daffonchio, Daniele G
Danchin, Antoine
de Lorenzo, Victor
Dorrestein, Pieter C
Finn, Robert D
Fraser, Claire M
Gilbert, Jack A
Hallam, Steven J
Hugenholtz, Philip
Ioannidis, John P A
Jansson, Janet K
Kim, Jihyun F
Klenk, Hans-Peter
Klotz, Martin G
Knight, Rob
Konstantinidis, Konstantinos T
Kyrpides, Nikos C
Mason, Christopher E
McHardy, Alice C
Meyer, Folker
Ouzounis, Christos A
Patrinos, Aristides A N
Podar, Mircea
Pollard, Katherine S
Ravel, Jacques
Muñoz, Alejandro Reyes
Roberts, Richard J
Rosselló-Móra, Ramon
Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
Schloss, Patrick D
Schriml, Lynn M
Setubal, João C
Sorek, Rotem
Stevens, Rick L
Tiedje, James M
Turjanski, Adrian
Tyson, Gene W
Ussery, David W
Weinstock, George M
White, Owen
Whitman, William B
Xenarios, Ioannis
Issue Date
2019-01-25
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Despite some notable progress in data sharing policies and practices, restrictions are still often placed on the open and unconditional use of various genomic data after they have received official approval for release to the public domain or to public databases. These restrictions, which often conflict with the terms and conditions of the funding bodies who supported the release of those data for the benefit of the scientific community and society, are perpetuated by the lack of clear guiding rules for data usage. Existing guidelines for data released to the public domain recognize but fail to resolve tensions between the importance of free and unconditional use of these data and the “right” of the data producers to the first publication. This self-contradiction has resulted in a loophole that allows different interpretations and a continuous debate between data producers and data users on the use of public data. We argue that the publicly available data should be treated as open data, a shared resource with unrestricted use for analysis, interpretation, and publication.Citation
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):350-352. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1280.Affiliation
BRICS, Braunschweiger Zentrum für Systembiologie, Rebenring 56,38106 Braunschweig, Germany.Publisher
AAASJournal
SciencePubMed ID
30679363Type
ArticleLanguage
enISSN
1095-9203ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1126/science.aaw1280
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Related articles
- Data sharing. Group calls for rapid release of more genomics data.
- Authors: Pennisi E
- Issue date: 2009 May 22
- A FAIR guide for data providers to maximise sharing of human genomic data.
- Authors: Corpas M, Kovalevskaya NV, McMurray A, Nielsen FGG
- Issue date: 2018 Mar
- Genomic databases: A WHO affair.
- Authors: Antonarakis SE
- Issue date: 2017 May 26
- The times they are a-changin'.
- Authors: Patrinos A, Drell D
- Issue date: 2002 Jun 6
- Diagnostic genomic laboratories should share their data.
- Authors: Poon KS, Koay ES
- Issue date: 2021 Jun