Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKarrasch, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Annette
dc.contributor.authorMeisinger, Christa
dc.contributor.authorFerland, Maike
dc.contributor.authorJaeschke, Lina
dc.contributor.authorPischon, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorFricke, Julia
dc.contributor.authorKeil, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGastell, Sylvia
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorBrandes, Mirko
dc.contributor.authorGünther, Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorKuß, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorSchikowski, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorEmmel, Carina
dc.contributor.authorJöckel, Karl-Heinz
dc.contributor.authorMichels, Karin B
dc.contributor.authorFranzke, Claus-Werner
dc.contributor.authorLanger, Susan
dc.contributor.authorMikolajczyk, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorJagodzinski, Annika
dc.contributor.authorBecher, Heiko
dc.contributor.authorCastell, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorKemmling, Yvonne
dc.contributor.authorWaniek, Sabina
dc.contributor.authorLieb, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorWirkner, Kerstin
dc.contributor.authorLoeffler, Markus
dc.contributor.authorGreiser, Karin Halina
dc.contributor.authorKaaks, Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorLegath, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorSchipf, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorSedlmeier, Anja
dc.contributor.authorLeitzmann, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBrenner, Hermann
dc.contributor.authorHolleczek, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Holger
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T15:28:00Z
dc.date.available2020-03-06T15:28:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-01
dc.identifier.citationBundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Mar;63(3):322-331. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03102-1.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1437-1588
dc.identifier.pmid32078705
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00103-020-03102-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/622193
dc.description.abstractIn the present dataset (n = 101,734), spirometry was available for 86,893 study participants and FeNO was available for 15,228 participants. The average (±SD) FEV1 Z score (according to GLI 2012) was -0.321 ± 1.047, the FVC Z score was -0.153 ± 0.941, and the FEV1/FVC Z score was -0.337 ± 0.901. The difference in FEV1/FVC between current smokers and never-smokers increased with age. The average FeNO was 14.2 ÷ 2.0 ppb. Current smoking reduced FeNO levels by 43%, whereas respiratory allergy increased FeNO levels by 16% in nonsmokers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Open choiceen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectAsthmaen_US
dc.subjectCOPDen_US
dc.subjectFeNOen_US
dc.subjectGerman National Cohorten_US
dc.subjectSpirometryen_US
dc.title[Lung function in the German National Cohort: methods and initial results].en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.journalBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutzen_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-06T15:28:01Z
dc.source.journaltitleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Karrasch et al.pdf
Size:
3.217Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Open Access article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International