Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKorsch, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMarten, Silke-Mareike
dc.contributor.authorWalther, Winfried
dc.contributor.authorVital, Marius
dc.contributor.authorPieper, Dietmar H
dc.contributor.authorDötsch, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-14T09:51:50Z
dc.date.available2020-08-14T09:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-20
dc.identifier.citationClin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(5):806-813. doi:10.1111/cid.12650.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30126038
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.12650
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/622408
dc.description.abstractBackground: The type of cement used in cemented fixed implant-supported restorations influences formation of undetected excess cement and composition of the peri-implant biofilm. Excess cement and dysbiosis of the biofilm involve the risk of peri-implant inflammation. Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of two different cements on the peri-implant biofilm and inflammation. Materials and methods: In an observational study, the suprastructures of 34 patients with cemented fixed implant-supported restorations were revised. In 20 patients, a methacrylate cement (Premier Implant cement [PIC]) and in 14 patients, a zinc oxide eugenol cement (Temp Bond [TB]) were used. After revision, TB was used for recementation. During revision and follow-up after 1 year, microbial samples were obtained. Results: Excess cement was found in 12 (60%) of the 20 patients with PIC. Suppuration was observed in two (25%) implants with PIC without excess cement (PIC-) and in all 12 (100%) implants with PIC and excess cement (PIC+). Implants cemented with TB had neither excess cement nor suppuration. The taxonomic analysis of the microbial samples revealed an accumulation of periodontal pathogens in the PIC patients independent of the presence of excess cement. Significantly, fewer oral pathogens occurred in patients with TB compared to patients with PIC. TB was used in all cases (PIC and TB) for recementation. In the follow-up check, suppuration was not found around any of the implants with PIC-, only around one implant with PIC+ and around one implant with TB. Bacterial species associated with severe periodontal infections that were abundant in PIC- and PIC+ samples before the revision were reduced after 1 year to levels found in the TB samples. Conclusions: The revision and recementation with TB had a positive effect on the peri-implant biofilm in cases with PIC. The cementation of suprastructures on implants with TB is an alternative method to be considered.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectbiofilmsen_US
dc.subjectdental cementsen_US
dc.subjectimplanten_US
dc.subjectin vivo observational studyen_US
dc.subjectmolecular biological analysisen_US
dc.titleImpact of dental cement on the peri-implant biofilm-microbial comparison of two different cements in an in vivo observational study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.identifier.eissn1708-8208
dc.contributor.departmentHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.journalClinical implant dentistry and related researchen_US
dc.source.volume20
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage806
dc.source.endpage813
refterms.dateFOA2020-08-14T09:51:51Z
dc.source.journaltitleClinical implant dentistry and related research
dc.source.countryUnited States


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Korsch et al.pdf
Size:
392.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
original manuscript
Thumbnail
Name:
figures 1 to 4.zip
Size:
266.2Kb
Format:
Unknown
Description:
figures 1 to 4

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International