Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPanwar, H
dc.contributor.authorRokana, N
dc.contributor.authorAparna, S V
dc.contributor.authorKaur, J
dc.contributor.authorSingh, A
dc.contributor.authorSingh, J
dc.contributor.authorSingh, K S
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary, V
dc.contributor.authorPuniya, A K
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T08:30:24Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T08:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-31
dc.identifier.citationBiotechnol Bioeng. 2020 Sep 3. doi: 10.1002/bit.27553. Epub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32869386
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jam.14836
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/622504
dc.description.abstractA comparison of the metabolic response of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) towards the production of human basic fibroblast growth factor (hFGF-2) or towards carbon overfeeding revealed similarities which point to constraints in anabolic pathways. Contrary to expectations, neither energy generation (e.g., ATP) nor provision of precursor molecules for nucleotides (e.g., uracil) and amino acids (e.g., pyruvate, glutamate) limit host cell and plasmid-encoded functions. Growth inhibition is assumed to occur when hampered anabolic capacities do not match with the ongoing and overwhelming carbon catabolism. Excessive carbon uptake leads to by-product secretion, for example, pyruvate, acetate, glutamate, and energy spillage, for example, accumulation and degradation of adenine nucleotides with concomitant accumulation of extracellular hypoxanthine. The cellular response towards compromised anabolic capacities involves downregulation of cAMP formation, presumably responsible for subsequently better-controlled glucose uptake and resultant accumulation of glucose in the culture medium. Growth inhibition is neglectable under conditions of reduced carbon availability when hampered anabolic capacities also match with catabolic carbon processing. The growth inhibitory effect with accompanying energy spillage, respectively, hypoxanthine secretion and cessation of cAMP formation is not unique to the production of hFGF-2 but observed during the production of other proteins and also during overexpression of genes without transcript translation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectGI tracten_US
dc.subjectcommensalen_US
dc.subjectgut immunityen_US
dc.subjecthost-microbe interactionsen_US
dc.subjectimmunologyen_US
dc.subjectpathogensen_US
dc.subjectprobioticsen_US
dc.titleGastrointestinal stress as innate defence against microbial attack.en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2672
dc.contributor.departmentHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.journalJournal of applied microbiologyen_US
refterms.dateFOA2020-10-09T08:30:25Z
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of applied microbiology
dc.source.countryEngland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Panwar et al.pdf
Size:
1.023Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Open Access publication

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International