Replicability, Repeatability, and Long-term Reproducibility of Cerebellar Morphometry.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractTo identify robust and reproducible methods of cerebellar morphometry that can be used in future large-scale structural MRI studies, we investigated the replicability, repeatability, and long-term reproducibility of three fully automated software tools: FreeSurfer, CEREbellum Segmentation (CERES), and automatic cerebellum anatomical parcellation using U-Net with locally constrained optimization (ACAPULCO). Replicability was defined as computational replicability, determined by comparing two analyses of the same high-resolution MRI data set performed with identical analysis software and computer hardware. Repeatability was determined by comparing the analyses of two MRI scans of the same participant taken during two independent MRI sessions on the same day for the Kirby-21 study. Long-term reproducibility was assessed by analyzing two MRI scans of the same participant in the longitudinal OASIS-2 study. We determined percent difference, the image intraclass correlation coefficient, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between two analyses. Our results show that CERES and ACAPULCO use stochastic algorithms that result in surprisingly high differences between identical analyses for ACAPULCO and small differences for CERES. Changes between two consecutive scans from the Kirby-21 study were less than ± 5% in most cases for FreeSurfer and CERES (i.e., demonstrating high repeatability). As expected, long-term reproducibility was lower than repeatability for all software tools. In summary, CERES is an accurate, as demonstrated before, and reproducible tool for fully automated segmentation and parcellation of the cerebellum. We conclude with recommendations for the assessment of replicability, repeatability, and long-term reproducibility in future studies on cerebellar structure.
CitationCerebellum. 2021 Jan 9. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01227-2. Epub ahead of print.
AffiliationHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
JournalCerebellum (London, England)
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
- Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations.
- Authors: Jovicich J, Marizzoni M, Sala-Llonch R, Bosch B, Bartrés-Faz D, Arnold J, Benninghoff J, Wiltfang J, Roccatagliata L, Nobili F, Hensch T, Tränkner A, Schönknecht P, Leroy M, Lopes R, Bordet R, Chanoine V, Ranjeva JP, Didic M, Gros-Dagnac H, Payoux P, Zoccatelli G, Alessandrini F, Beltramello A, Bargalló N, Blin O, Frisoni GB, PharmaCog Consortium.
- Issue date: 2013 Dec
- Reproducibility of Brain Morphometry from Short-Term Repeat Clinical MRI Examinations: A Retrospective Study.
- Authors: Yang CY, Liu HM, Chen SK, Chen YF, Lee CW, Yeh LR
- Issue date: 2016
- Reproducibility of Aorta Segmentation on 4D Flow MRI in Healthy Volunteers.
- Authors: Juffermans JF, Westenberg JJM, van den Boogaard PJ, Roest AAW, van Assen HC, van der Palen RLF, Lamb HJ
- Issue date: 2020 Nov 11
- MRI-based surface-assisted parcellation of human cerebellar cortex: an anatomically specified method with estimate of reliability.
- Authors: Makris N, Schlerf JE, Hodge SM, Haselgrove C, Albaugh MD, Seidman LJ, Rauch SL, Harris G, Biederman J, Caviness VS Jr, Kennedy DN, Schmahmann JD
- Issue date: 2005 May 1
- Evaluation of the intra- and inter-method agreement of brain MRI segmentation software packages: A comparison between SPM12 and FreeSurfer v6.0.
- Authors: Palumbo L, Bosco P, Fantacci ME, Ferrari E, Oliva P, Spera G, Retico A
- Issue date: 2019 Aug