Removable denture is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis and facilitates expansion of specific periodontopathogens: a cross-sectional study.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Szafrański, Szymon P
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: The prevalence of peri-implantitis ranges between 7 and 38.4% depending on risk indicators such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, lack of periodontal maintenance program, and history or presence of periodontitis. Currently, the possible effect of the type of superstructure on peri-implant health is unclear. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the influence of the superstructure on the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis and peri-implant dysbiosis. Methods: During a 32-month recruitment period dental implants were assessed to diagnose healthy peri-implant tissues, mucositis or peri-implantitis. The study included 1097 implants in 196 patients. Out of all peri-implantitis cases 20 randomly chosen submucosal biofilms from implants with fixed denture (FD) originating from 13 patients and 11 biofilms from implants with removable dentures (RD) originating from 3 patients were studied for microbiome analysis. Composition of transcriptionally active biofilms was revealed by RNAseq. Metatranscriptomic profiles were created for thirty-one peri-implant biofilms suffering from peri-implantitis and microbiome changes associated with superstructure types were identified. Results: 16.41% of the implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis, 25.00% of implants with RD and 12.68% of implants with FD, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a significant positive association on patient (p = < 0.001) and implant level (p = 0.03) between the prevalence of peri-implantitis and RD. Eight bacterial species were associated either with FD or RD by linear discriminant analysis effect size method. However, significant intergroup confounders (e.g. smoking) were present. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present work, RDs appear to be a risk indicator for peri-implantitis and seem to facilitate expansion of specific periodontopathogens. Potential ecological and pathological consequences of shift in microbiome from RDs towards higher activity of Fusobacterium nucleatum subspecies animalis and Prevotella intermedia require further investigation.
CitationBMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01529-9.
AffiliationHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
JournalBMC oral health
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
- Frequency of periodontal pathogens in equivalent peri-implant and periodontal clinical statuses.
- Authors: Cortelli SC, Cortelli JR, Romeiro RL, Costa FO, Aquino DR, Orzechowski PR, Araújo VC, Duarte PM
- Issue date: 2013 Jan
- Prevalence of peri-implant inflammatory disease in patients with a history of periodontal disease who receive supportive periodontal therapy.
- Authors: Aguirre-Zorzano LA, Estefanía-Fresco R, Telletxea O, Bravo M
- Issue date: 2015 Nov
- Microbiologic and Clinical Findings of Implants in Healthy Condition and with Peri-Implantitis.
- Authors: Canullo L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Covani U, Rossetti PH
- Issue date: 2015 Jul-Aug
- Prevalence and risk/protective indicators of peri-implant diseases: A university-representative cross-sectional study.
- Authors: Romandini M, Lima C, Pedrinaci I, Araoz A, Soldini MC, Sanz M
- Issue date: 2021 Jan
- Cross-sectional study on the prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implant diseases.
- Authors: Konstantinidis IK, Kotsakis GA, Gerdes S, Walter MH
- Issue date: 2015 Spring