Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrischke, Jasmin
dc.contributor.authorSzafrański, Szymon P
dc.contributor.authorMuthukumarasamy, Uthayakumar
dc.contributor.authorHäussler, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorStiesch, Meike
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-19T09:48:27Z
dc.date.available2021-05-19T09:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-01
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01529-9.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33794847
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-021-01529-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10033/622879
dc.description.abstractBackground: The prevalence of peri-implantitis ranges between 7 and 38.4% depending on risk indicators such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, lack of periodontal maintenance program, and history or presence of periodontitis. Currently, the possible effect of the type of superstructure on peri-implant health is unclear. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the influence of the superstructure on the prevalence of peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis and peri-implant dysbiosis. Methods: During a 32-month recruitment period dental implants were assessed to diagnose healthy peri-implant tissues, mucositis or peri-implantitis. The study included 1097 implants in 196 patients. Out of all peri-implantitis cases 20 randomly chosen submucosal biofilms from implants with fixed denture (FD) originating from 13 patients and 11 biofilms from implants with removable dentures (RD) originating from 3 patients were studied for microbiome analysis. Composition of transcriptionally active biofilms was revealed by RNAseq. Metatranscriptomic profiles were created for thirty-one peri-implant biofilms suffering from peri-implantitis and microbiome changes associated with superstructure types were identified. Results: 16.41% of the implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis, 25.00% of implants with RD and 12.68% of implants with FD, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed a significant positive association on patient (p = < 0.001) and implant level (p = 0.03) between the prevalence of peri-implantitis and RD. Eight bacterial species were associated either with FD or RD by linear discriminant analysis effect size method. However, significant intergroup confounders (e.g. smoking) were present. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present work, RDs appear to be a risk indicator for peri-implantitis and seem to facilitate expansion of specific periodontopathogens. Potential ecological and pathological consequences of shift in microbiome from RDs towards higher activity of Fusobacterium nucleatum subspecies animalis and Prevotella intermedia require further investigation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectBiofilmen_US
dc.subjectDysbiosisen_US
dc.subjectFixed denturesen_US
dc.subjectFusobacterium nucleatumen_US
dc.subjectMicrobiomeen_US
dc.subjectPeri-implant mucositisen_US
dc.subjectPeri-implantitisen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectPrevotella intermediaen_US
dc.subjectRNAseqen_US
dc.subjectRemovable denturesen_US
dc.subjectRisk indicatoren_US
dc.titleRemovable denture is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis and facilitates expansion of specific periodontopathogens: a cross-sectional study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6831
dc.contributor.departmentHZI,Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH, Inhoffenstr. 7,38124 Braunschweig, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.journalBMC oral healthen_US
dc.source.volume21
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage173
dc.source.endpage
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-19T09:48:28Z
dc.source.journaltitleBMC oral health
dc.source.countryEngland


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Grischke et al.pdf
Size:
2.451Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Open Access publication

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International