HBV-RNA Co-amplification May Influence HBV DNA Viral Load Determination.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Geretti, Anna Maria
Simon, Christian O
Marins, Ed G
Canchola, Jesse A
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractDespite effective hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA suppression, HBV RNA can circulate in patients receiving nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs). Current assays quantify HBV DNA by either real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which uses DNA polymerase, or transcription-mediated amplification, which uses reverse-transcriptase (RT) and RNA polymerase. We assessed the effect of RT capability on HBV-DNA quantification in samples from three cohorts, including patients with quantified HBV RNA. We compared the HBV-DNA levels by real-time PCR (cobas HBV, Roche 6800/8800; Xpert HBV, Cepheid), transcription-mediated amplification (Aptima HBV, Hologic), and real-time PCR with added RT capability (cobas HBV+RT). In the first cohort (n = 45) followed over 192 weeks of NA therapy, on-treatment HBV-DNA levels were higher with cobas HBV+RT than cobas HBV (mean difference: 0.14 log10 IU/mL). In a second cohort (n = 50) followed over 96 weeks of NA therapy, HBV-DNA viral load was significantly higher with the cobas HBV+RT and Aptima HBV compared with the cobas HBV test at all time points after initiation of NA therapy (mean difference: 0.65-1.16 log10 IU/mL). A clinically significant difference was not detected between the assays at baseline. In a third cohort (n = 53), after a median of 2.2 years of NA therapy, we detected HBV RNA (median 5.6 log10 copies/mL) in 23 patients (43.4%). Median HBV-DNA levels by Aptima HBV were 2.4 versus less than 1 log10 IU/mL in samples with HBV RNA and without HBV RNA, respectively (P = 0.0006). In treated patients with HBV RNA, Aptima HBV measured higher HBV-DNA levels than Xpert HBV and cobas HBV. Conclusion: Tests including an RT step may overestimate HBV DNA, particularly in samples with low viral loads as a result of NA therapy. This overestimation is likely due to amplification of HBV RNA and may have an impact on clinical decisions.
CitationHepatol Commun. 2020 May 26;4(7):983-997. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1520. PMID: 32626831.
AffiliationCiiM, Zentrum für individualisierte Infektionsmedizin, Feodor-Lynen-Str.7, 30625 Hannover.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
- Dynamic comparison between Daan real-time PCR and Cobas TaqMan for quantification of HBV DNA levels in patients with CHB.
- Authors: Cai SH, Lv FF, Zhang YH, Jiang YG, Peng J
- Issue date: 2014 Feb 14
- Analytical performance of the Hologic Aptima HBV Quant Assay and the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HBV test v2.0 for the quantification of HBV DNA in plasma samples.
- Authors: Schønning K, Johansen K, Nielsen LG, Weis N, Westh H
- Issue date: 2018 Jul
- Comparison of Transcription-Mediated Amplification and Real-Time PCR Assays for Hepatitis B Virus DNA Quantitation in Serum.
- Authors: Weber J, Sahoo MK, Taylor N, Uy E, Shi RZ, Pinsky BA
- Issue date: 2019 Nov
- Verification of the Roche cobas<sup>®</sup> 6800 PCR 200 µl and 500 µl protocols for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA, HBV DNA and HCV RNA and evaluation with COBAS<sup>®</sup> Ampliprep/COBAS<sup>®</sup> TaqMan<sup>®</sup> assays.
- Authors: Tan NK, Carrington D, Pope CF
- Issue date: 2018 Dec
- Performance of the cobas Hepatitis B virus (HBV) test using the cobas 4800 system and comparison of HBV DNA quantification ability between the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HBV test version 2.0 and cobas HBV test.
- Authors: Shin KH, Lee HJ, Chang CL, Kim HH
- Issue date: 2018 Apr