A COMPARISON OF SOME GRAM-NEGATIVE, YELLOW PIGMENTED RODS ISOLATED FROM ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLINICAL SOURCES
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
1981-03Submitted date
2023-03-29
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
A numerical taxonomic study was undertaken to compare 86 strains of Gram negative, yellow pigmented rods including 9 reference strains and 17 clinical isolates. Computation of data by a nearest neighbour sorting strategy separated a group of 28 strains at the 65% s level which corresponded to the revised genus description of Flavobaeterium [12]. This group included strains of F. breve (NCTC 11099), F. odoratum (NCTC 11036), King's group IIb (NCTC 10795), clinical isolates and environmental isolates. F. meningosepticum (NCTC 10016), NCTC 10798 (King's group IIf) and F. aquatile (NCIB 8694) were excluded and the latter was contained in a group with F. peetinovorum (=C. johnsonae NCIB 9059) and other gliding strains. In the Flavobaeterium group four isolates were presumptively identified as F. odoratum, five isolates as F. breve, but the remainder could not be assigned to well defined species. The results of the study have been used to illustrate research needs for Gram negative yellow pigmented rods.Citation
The Flavobacterium-Cytophaga Group, 91Affiliation
IRepatriation General Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Department: of Agricultural Science, University of Tasmania, G.P.0. Box 252C, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, AustraliaType
Book chapterconference paper
Language
enSeries/Report no.
GBF Monograph Series, No. 5Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International